Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Dave,

This fixes it (I wonder if this bug is lurking in any other drivers):

Yes, there are some other exists. This spatch script can help to found this.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

# cat netdev_dev_addr.cocci
@@
struct net_device *dev;
@@
memcpy(
- &dev->dev_addr
+ dev->dev_addr
, ...);

@@
struct net_device *dev;
expression E;
@@
memcpy(E,
- &dev->dev_addr
+ dev->dev_addr
, ...);

@@
expression E;
@@
- &E->dev_addr
+ E->dev_addr


From: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:24:02 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] net/ibmveth: fix panic in probe

netdev->dev_addr changed from being an array to being a pointer, so we
should not take its address for memcpy().

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/net/ibmveth.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
index 7902e5e..8daffad 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ static int __devinit ibmveth_probe(struct vio_dev *dev, 
const struct vio_device_
        netdev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
        spin_lock_init(&adapter->stats_lock);
- memcpy(&netdev->dev_addr, &adapter->mac_addr, netdev->addr_len);
+       memcpy(netdev->dev_addr, &adapter->mac_addr, netdev->addr_len);
for(i = 0; i<IbmVethNumBufferPools; i++) {
                struct kobject *kobj = &adapter->rx_buff_pool[i].kobj;

maybe this line should be fix too.


@@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ static void ibmveth_proc_unregister_driv
static int ibmveth_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
        struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter = seq->private;
-       char *current_mac = ((char*) &adapter->netdev->dev_addr);
+       char *current_mac = ((char*) adapter->netdev->dev_addr);
        char *firmware_mac = ((char*) &adapter->mac_addr) ;

        seq_printf(seq, "%s %s\n\n", ibmveth_driver_string, 
ibmveth_driver_version);


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to