Michael,
On 08/12/2016 02:54 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> I don't have more obvious comments except below one nitpicky:
I just addressed/replied this in the other e-mail; i think it's OK,
and Andrew/cxl is OK w/ it too.
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan
On 08/12/2016 03:06 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Su
On 08/12/2016 03:03 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 12/08/16 15:54, Gavin Shan wrote:
It might be nicer for users to implement their own
pcibios_free_controller_deferred(),
meaning pSeries needs its own implementation for now. The reason is
more user (pSeries)
specific objects can be released tog
On 12/08/16 06:25, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
This patch leverages 'struct pci_host_bridge' from the PCI subsystem
in order to free the pci_controller only after the last reference to
its devices is dropped (avoiding an oops in pcibios_release_device()
if the last reference is dropped afte
On 12/08/16 15:54, Gavin Shan wrote:
It might be nicer for users to implement their own
pcibios_free_controller_deferred(),
meaning pSeries needs its own implementation for now. The reason is more user
(pSeries)
specific objects can be released together with the PHB. However, I'm still fine
wi
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:25:40PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>This patch leverages 'struct pci_host_bridge' from the PCI subsystem
>in order to free the pci_controller only after the last reference to
>its devices is dropped (avoiding an oops in pcibios_release_device()
>if the last
This patch leverages 'struct pci_host_bridge' from the PCI subsystem
in order to free the pci_controller only after the last reference to
its devices is dropped (avoiding an oops in pcibios_release_device()
if the last reference is dropped after pcibios_free_controller()).
The patch relies on pci_
