Michael,

On 08/12/2016 02:54 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> I don't have more obvious comments except below one nitpicky:

I just addressed/replied this in the other e-mail; i think it's OK,
and Andrew/cxl is OK w/ it too.

> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


On 08/12/2016 03:06 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Suggested-By: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com> # cxl

Does this justify a Cc: stable?

I'd think so, since this prevents an oops & crash (w/ panic_on_oops).
Do you agree?

Thanks!

--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

Reply via email to