Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:19:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 14:48:29 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > > On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Hi
On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 14:48:29 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Hi Millian, can I take this as an Acked-by or Tested-by?
> >
> > I have no
Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Hi Millian, can I take this as an Acked-by or Tested-by?
> I have no access to any PowerPC hardware. In principle the code looks
> fine, but that's all I
On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:46:16AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:55:09 PM CEST Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> > Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
> >
> > commit 5ea0416f51
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:06:35PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:16:32PM +0200, Mark Wielaard escreveu:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:46 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
> > >
> > > commit 5ea0416f51
Em Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:46:16AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:55:09 PM CEST Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
> commit 5ea0416f51cc93436bbe497c62ab49fd9cb245b6
> Author: Milian Wolff
> Date: Thu Jun 1 23:00:21
Em Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:16:32PM +0200, Mark Wielaard escreveu:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:46 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
> >
> > commit 5ea0416f51cc93436bbe497c62ab49fd9cb245b6
> > Author: Milian Wolff
> > Date: Thu Jun 1 23:00
Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 12:24:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini escreveu:
> Porting PPC to libdw only needs an architecture-specific hook to move
> the register state from perf to libdw.
>
> The ARM and x86 architectures already use libdw, and it is useful to
> have as much common code for the unwinder as
Works like a charm with Milian's patch.
Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria
Note:
I still see very minor differences between libunwind and libdw. Also, second
last
function gets repeated two times in every callchain but it can be fixed later
on.
Otherwise all looks good!
Thanks,
-Ravi
On Thursday 15 Jun
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 12:24:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Porting PPC to libdw only needs an architecture-specific hook to move
> the register state from perf to libdw.
>
> The ARM and x86 architectures already use libdw, and it is useful to
> have as much common code for the unwinder as po
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:46 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
>
> commit 5ea0416f51cc93436bbe497c62ab49fd9cb245b6
> Author: Milian Wolff
> Date: Thu Jun 1 23:00:21 2017 +0200
>
> perf report: Include partial stacks unwound with libdw
On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:55:09 PM CEST Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tuesday 13 June 2017 05:14 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I see the same on very short runs. But when doing a slightly longer run,
> > even just using ls -lahR, which does some more work, then I do see user
> > backtrac
Hi Mark,
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 05:14 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I see the same on very short runs. But when doing a slightly longer run,
> even just using ls -lahR, which does some more work, then I do see user
> backtraces. They are still missing for some of the early samples though.
> It is as
Hi Ravi,
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 17:28 +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> So, I tested this patch along with Mark's patch[1] on elfutils an looks
> like it's not working. Steps on what I did:
>
> After applying Mark's patch on upstream elfutils:
>
> $ aclocal
> $ autoheader
> $ autoconf
> $ aut
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for the patch and really sorry for being late. I was quite busy
with few other things.
On Friday 09 June 2017 06:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 01/06/2017 12:24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Porting PPC to libdw only needs an architecture-specific hook to move
>> the register stat
On 01/06/2017 12:24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Porting PPC to libdw only needs an architecture-specific hook to move
> the register state from perf to libdw.
>
> The ARM and x86 architectures already use libdw, and it is useful to
> have as much common code for the unwinder as possible. Mark Wiela
Porting PPC to libdw only needs an architecture-specific hook to move
the register state from perf to libdw.
The ARM and x86 architectures already use libdw, and it is useful to
have as much common code for the unwinder as possible. Mark Wielaard
has contributed a frame-based unwinder to libdw, s
17 matches
Mail list logo
