Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu: > On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Hi Millian, can I take this as an Acked-by or Tested-by? > I have no access to any PowerPC hardware. In principle the code looks > fine, but that's all I can say here.
Ok, that would count as an Acked-by, i.e. from Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: ------------------------- Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me" into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an explicit ack). ------------------------- If you had a ppc machine _and_ had applied and tested the patch, that would allow us to use a Tested-by tag. Ok? - Arnaldo
