From: "Naveen N. Rao"
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:32:56 +0530
> Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
> sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
> covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
> quickly tag the p
On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
quickly tag the precise problem.
Cc: Al
On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
> >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
> >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit te
On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
quickly tag the precise problem.
Cc: Alexei
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
quickly tag the precise problem.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov
Cc: Daniel Borkmann
Cc: "Dav
