On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to > >quickly tag the precise problem. > > > >Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@fb.com> > >Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> > >Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> > >Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ana...@in.ibm.com> > >Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > >Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > >Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of > available ppc instructions. Nice. > > I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit?
Yes, all these tests pass on x86_64. - Naveen _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
