On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 20:07 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 12:01 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> > In original design, it tries to group VFs to enable more number of VFs in
> > the
> > system, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB. This design has a flaw in which one
> > error on a VF will int
On 08/19/2015 12:01 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
In original design, it tries to group VFs to enable more number of VFs in the
system, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB. This design has a flaw in which one
error on a VF will interfere other VFs in the same group.
This patch series change this design by usi
On 08/26/2015 03:11 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 08/19/2015 12:01 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
In original design, it tries to group VFs to enable more number of VFs in
the
system, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB. This design has a flaw in which one
error on a VF will interfere other VFs in the sam
On 08/19/2015 12:01 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
In original design, it tries to group VFs to enable more number of VFs in the
system, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB. This design has a flaw in which one
error on a VF will interfere other VFs in the same group.
This patch series change this design by usi
In original design, it tries to group VFs to enable more number of VFs in the
system, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB. This design has a flaw in which one
error on a VF will interfere other VFs in the same group.
This patch series change this design by using M64 BAR in Single PE mode to
cover only
