On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:43:02AM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:11:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:59:42PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:49:00PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> > > > From: Mark A. Greer <[E
However, I can't resist pointing out that in the existing devtrees
with a "soc" node, the name is also misleading. That node doesn't
refer to the SOC itself, but to the part of the SOC containing the
peripherals. Whether the system is implemented on one or two chips
is an implementation detail i
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:11:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:59:42PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:49:00PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> > > From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Remove several unused (or software config o
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:59:42PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:49:00PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> > From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Remove several unused (or software config only) properties.
> > Rename marvel node to "soc". Technically, it's not
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:49:00PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Remove several unused (or software config only) properties.
> Rename marvel node to "soc". Technically, it's not an SOC,
> but its organization is the same as an SOC. Also, rename the
>
From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Remove several unused (or software config only) properties.
Rename marvel node to "soc". Technically, it's not an SOC,
but its organization is the same as an SOC. Also, rename the
"block-index" property to "cell-index" to conform to current
practice.
Sign
