On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
> > ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
> > right as possible.
> >
> > I think
On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
> ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
> right as possible.
>
> I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
> the Documen
I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
right as possible.
I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
the Documentation/.../fsl-flexcan.txt file which has essentially become
On 08/09/2011 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
>>> the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
>>> The driver do
On 08/09/2011 02:49 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Yes. The doc for the bindings we speak about
>
> http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.0.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
>
> sneaked into the kernel without been presented on any mailing list and
> without the corresponding
On 08/09/2011 09:13 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 01:45 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan devic
On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
>> the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
>> The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required
On 08/09/2011 01:45 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
>>> the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
>>> The
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
> > the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
> > The driver does not depend upon any properties ot
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
> the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
> The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required
> properties
> so we are removing the file.
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up. The driver
does not depend upon any properties other than the required properties
so we are removing the file. Additionally, the p1010*dts files are not
following t
11 matches
Mail list logo
