Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/fsl: 85xx: add cache-sram support

On Oct 5, 2009, at 2:15 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote: From: Gala Kumar-B11780 Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:08 AM + mbar(1); why isn't eieio() sufficient here? When I initially added / tested cache SRAM for P2020RDB, its RM talked about using mbar() though mbar(1) is identica

RE: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/fsl: 85xx: add cache-sram support

> From: Gala Kumar-B11780 > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:08 AM > > + mbar(1); > > why isn't eieio() sufficient here? When I initially added / tested cache SRAM for P2020RDB, its RM talked about using mbar() though mbar(1) is identical to eieio() opcode-wise. Also as cache-sram works onl

Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/fsl: 85xx: add cache-sram support

On Sep 24, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Vivek Mahajan wrote: This adds QorIQ based Cache-SRAM support as under:- * A small abstraction over powerpc's remote heap allocator * Exports mpc85xx_cache_sram_alloc()/free() APIs * Supports only one contiguous SRAM window * Defines FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM and its bas

[PATCH 4/4] powerpc/fsl: 85xx: add cache-sram support

This adds QorIQ based Cache-SRAM support as under:- * A small abstraction over powerpc's remote heap allocator * Exports mpc85xx_cache_sram_alloc()/free() APIs * Supports only one contiguous SRAM window * Defines FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM and its base address Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan --- Resending

[PATCH 4/4] powerpc/fsl: 85xx: add cache-sram support

This adds QorIQ based Cache-SRAM support as under:- * A small abstraction over powerpc's remote heap allocator * Exports mpc85xx_cache_sram_alloc()/free() APIs * Supports only one contiguous SRAM window * Defines FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM and its base address Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan --- arch/pow