On Oct 5, 2009, at 2:15 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
From: Gala Kumar-B11780
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:08 AM
+ mbar(1);
why isn't eieio() sufficient here?
When I initially added / tested cache SRAM for P2020RDB, its RM talked
about using mbar() though mbar(1) is identical to eieio() opcode-wise.
Also as cache-sram works only for 85xx derivatives, so I picked mbar()
instead of eieio.
Let use eieio since there is no reason to special case the usage here
for mbar(1)
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
