On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:49AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> >
> > Ah... I think I see the source of our misunderstanding. Sorry if I
> > was unclear. I'm not saying that the version token would be
> > invisible to the parser, just that it would
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
>
> Ah... I think I see the source of our misunderstanding. Sorry if I
> was unclear. I'm not saying that the version token would be
> invisible to the parser, just that it would be recognized by the lexer
> first.
Ah! Right. OK, I see what you are
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:24:57PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > > Use of "d#', "o#", "h#" and "b#" are gone in version 1.
> >
> > Also good. We might want to keep b#, since there's no C way of doing
> > binary literals, but in that case I'd sugges
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > Use of "d#', "o#", "h#" and "b#" are gone in version 1.
>
> Also good. We might want to keep b#, since there's no C way of doing
> binary literals, but in that case I'd suggest recognizing it at the
> lexical level, not the grammar level as we do
Property names have been limited to start with
characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the
digits and the expression symbols have been removed.
>>>
>>> This cannot work; many property names start with a digit,
>>> for example.
>>
>> Are any of those property names in use in
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:36:57AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day Segher Boessenkool mumbled:
> > > Property names have been limited to start with
> > > characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the
> > > digits and the expression symbols have been removed.
> >
> > Thi
So, like, the other day Segher Boessenkool mumbled:
> > Property names have been limited to start with
> > characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the
> > digits and the expression symbols have been removed.
>
> This cannot work; many property names start with a digit,
> for example.
Are
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:30:45AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Property names have been limited to start with
> > characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the
> > digits and the expression symbols have been removed.
>
> This cannot work; many property names start with a digit,
> f
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:32:33AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> Use of "d#', "o#", "h#" and "b#" are gone in version 1.
> >
> > Also good. We might want to keep b#, since there's no C way of doing
> > binary literals,
>
> GCC supports "0b...", and it is proposed new ISO C syntax, too.
A
>> Use of "d#', "o#", "h#" and "b#" are gone in version 1.
>
> Also good. We might want to keep b#, since there's no C way of doing
> binary literals,
GCC supports "0b...", and it is proposed new ISO C syntax, too.
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing lis
> Property names have been limited to start with
> characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the
> digits and the expression symbols have been removed.
This cannot work; many property names start with a digit,
for example.
Segher
___
Linuxppc-d
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:43:30PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> Add support for the "/dts-version/ ;" statment.
> Make legacy DTS files version 0 whether explicitly stated
> or implied by a lack of /dts-version/ statement.
>
> Begin supporting a new /dts-version/ 1 that changes the
> format of
Add support for the "/dts-version/ ;" statment.
Make legacy DTS files version 0 whether explicitly stated
or implied by a lack of /dts-version/ statement.
Begin supporting a new /dts-version/ 1 that changes the
format of the literals in a DTS source file. In the new
format, hex constants are pre
13 matches
Mail list logo
