>>>> Property names have been limited to start with >>>> characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the >>>> digits and the expression symbols have been removed. >>> >>> This cannot work; many property names start with a digit, >>> for example. >> >> Are any of those property names in use in any >> of our DTS files or b-w-o.txt? Not really, no. >> In fact, with this lexical change, all of our >> DTS files still produce byte-identical results. >> >> I really think this is one of those areas where >> we may need to stray from the other guideline. >> >> Is there a compelling reason somewhere? Really? > > We may have deprecated te '64-bit' and '32-64-bridge' properties in > cpu nodes for the flattened tree, but it already exists in a great > number of Apple and IBM trees.
Huh? "64-bit" isn't deprecated I hope, just the "32-bit" thing (that never was defined) is. > It would be poor form for dtc to choke on these trees. Yah. Small incompatibilities add up :-( Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
