Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-30 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:10:46AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:58:12PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:48:54AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:55:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > > Am I correct in thinking that it's

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-30 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:58:12PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:48:54AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:55:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > Am I correct in thinking that it's basically an arch/ppc versus > > > arch/powerpc thing. In which cas

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-29 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:48:54AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:55:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > Am I correct in thinking that it's basically an arch/ppc versus > > arch/powerpc thing. In which case couldn't you use CONFIG_PPC_MERGE > > instead? > > The idea was to

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-29 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:55:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > Am I correct in thinking that it's basically an arch/ppc versus > arch/powerpc thing. In which case couldn't you use CONFIG_PPC_MERGE > instead? The idea was to allow boards to be converted incrementally, as I don't have access to te

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-29 Thread David Gibson
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:39:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:16:19PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > Boards that do not require the legacy bindings should select > > > CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING to enable t

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-29 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:39:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:16:19PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > Boards that do not require the legacy bindings should select > > CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING to enable the of_platform CPM devices. Once > > all existing boards are convert

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-28 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:16:19PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > This introduces a new device binding for the CPM and other devices on > these boards. Some of the changes include: > > 1. Proper namespace scoping for Freescale compatibles and properties. > > 2. Use compatible rather than things like

[PATCH 2/3] Introduce new CPM device bindings.

2007-08-28 Thread Scott Wood
This introduces a new device binding for the CPM and other devices on these boards. Some of the changes include: 1. Proper namespace scoping for Freescale compatibles and properties. 2. Use compatible rather than things like device_type and model to determine which particular variant of a device