On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:55:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > Am I correct in thinking that it's basically an arch/ppc versus > arch/powerpc thing. In which case couldn't you use CONFIG_PPC_MERGE > instead?
The idea was to allow boards to be converted incrementally, as I don't have access to test 100% of the boards that use the CPM code. > > It has a phandle to the phy node... if you mean the mdio bus node, why? > > Well, I'm just working of the example of 4xx EMAC. The way it does > mdio, it wants a handle on the mdio bus to perform various operations > there as well on the phy to tell it how to address them. fsl-enet may > do things differently and have no particular need for such a handle. Even if it did need such a handle, couldn't it just look at the phy node's parent? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
