On 2014/2/6 4:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Yijing,
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, David Laight wrote:
>
>> From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk
>>> On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
functions always return 0, it's pointless, ma
Yijing,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, David Laight wrote:
> From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk
> > On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> > > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> > > And remove the dead cod
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/23/2014 08:12 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> > And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk
> On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> > And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> > return value.
On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
return value.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
..
diff --g
On 23/01/14 20:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
-static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
hz)
+static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
hz)
{
return __clocksource_register_s
On 2014/1/23 16:40, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/23/2014 08:12 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
>> functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
>> And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
>> r
On 01/23/2014 08:12 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
return value.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
Well, do w
On 2014/1/23 16:04, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On 23/01/14 20:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
-static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
hz)
+static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs
Around Thu 23 Jan 2014 15:12:46 +0800 or thereabout, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> return value.
>
> S
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
>> -static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
>> hz)
>> +static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
>> hz)
>> {
>> return __clocksource_register_scale(cs, 1, hz);
>> }
>
>
> Thi
Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
return value.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/time.c|
12 matches
Mail list logo
