On 23/01/14 20:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk <li...@prisktech.co.nz> wrote:
-static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
hz)
+static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
hz)
{
return __clocksource_register_scale(cs, 1, hz);
}
This doesn't make sense - you are still returning a value on a function
declared void, and the return is now from a function that doesn't return
anything either ?!?!
Doesn't this throw a compile-time warning??
No, passing on void in functions returning void doesn't cause compiler
warnings.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Doesn't seem right to me (even if there is no warning) but that's
probably because I used to program in Pascal where functions with no
return were 'procedures' :)
Whether it needs to be changed or not:
For the vt8500 part -
Acked-by: Tony Prisk <li...@prisktech.co.nz>
Regards
Tony Prisk
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
