On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:30 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 07:42 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> Let's rename this function to something 'linear_map'. As on FSL
> >> Book-E 64 we do things a bit differently and have more covered in
> >> linear map than 1G
> >
> > It's not quite
On Apr 18, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 07:42 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Let's rename this function to something 'linear_map'. As on FSL
>> Book-E 64 we do things a bit differently and have more covered in
>> linear map than 1G
>
> It's not quite line
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 07:42 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Let's rename this function to something 'linear_map'. As on FSL
> Book-E 64 we do things a bit differently and have more covered in
> linear map than 1G
It's not quite linear_map. It's whatever can be accessed without taking
exceptions. IE. W
On Apr 15, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman
>
> On BOOK3E we don't have an SLB 0, but the equivalent concept is the
> bolted entry mapping the kernel. Currently this is a 1G entry, so
> for now hardcode that. This will probably need to be reworked in
> future.
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman
>
> On BOOK3E we don't have an SLB 0, but the equivalent concept is the
> bolted entry mapping the kernel. Currently this is a 1G entry, so
> for now hardcode that. This will probably need to be reworked in
> f
From: Michael Ellerman
On BOOK3E we don't have an SLB 0, but the equivalent concept is the
bolted entry mapping the kernel. Currently this is a 1G entry, so
for now hardcode that. This will probably need to be reworked in
future.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64
