Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi_mpc83xx: Handles other Freescale processors

On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry about Kconfig anymore. Also

Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi_mpc83xx: Handles other Freescale processors

Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx >> platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry >> about Kconfig anymore. >> >> Also remove the "experimental" dependency,

Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi_mpc83xx: Handles other Freescale processors

On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry about Kconfig anymore. Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been tested to work

[PATCH 1/3] spi_mpc83xx: Handles other Freescale processors

With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the MPC86xx platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to worry about Kconfig anymore. Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been tested to work on a various hardware, and surely not experimental anym