Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-11 Thread Liu ping fan
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:50 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: >> > why ? , All the hash routines do check for _PAGE_PRESENT via access >> > variable. >> > >> Going through __hash_page_4K(4k on 4k HW), I do not find such check. >> Am I wrong

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-11 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:50 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: > > why ? , All the hash routines do check for _PAGE_PRESENT via access > > variable. > > > Going through __hash_page_4K(4k on 4k HW), I do not find such check. > Am I wrong? Or I will send out a patch to fix that. We pass a bitmask of flags t

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-11 Thread Liu ping fan
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Liu Ping Fan writes: > >> To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in >> hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan >> --- >> arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 2 +- >> 1 file

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-08 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 14:17 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> Liu Ping Fan writes: > >> > >> > To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in > >> > hash_p

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-08 Thread Liu ping fan
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> Liu Ping Fan writes: >> >> > To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in >> > hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa(). > > For some reason I

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-08 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Liu Ping Fan writes: > > > To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in > > hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa(). For some reason I don't have 2/3 and 3/3 in my mbox (though I do have them on patchwork)

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-05 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Liu Ping Fan writes: > To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in > hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa(). > > Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan > --- > arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/power

[PATCH 1/3] powerpc: mm: make _PAGE_NUMA take effect

2013-12-03 Thread Liu Ping Fan
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa(). Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan --- arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm