On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Liu Ping Fan <kernelf...@gmail.com> writes: > > > To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in > > hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa().
For some reason I don't have 2/3 and 3/3 in my mbox (though I do have them on patchwork) so I'll reply to this one. Overall, your statement that this is a faster path needs to be backed up with numbers. The code is complicated enough as it-is, such additional mess in the low level hashing code requires a good justification, and also a demonstration that it doesn't add overhead to the normal hash path. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
