Sorry to update lately. It takes a long time to apply for test machine
and then, I hit a series of other bugs which I could not resolve
easily. And for now, I have some high priority task, and will come
back to this topic when time is available.
Besides this, I had do some basic test for numa-fault
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> Paul Mackerras writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15.01.2014, at 07:36, Liu ping fan wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11.12.2013
Paul Mackerras writes:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 15.01.2014, at 07:36, Liu ping fan wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> This series is bas
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 15.01.2014, at 07:36, Liu ping fan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> >>
> >>> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Liu ping fan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
> wrote:
>> Liu ping fan writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
>>> wrote:
Liu ping fan writes:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf w
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> Liu ping fan writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
>> wrote:
>>> Liu ping fan writes:
>>>
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>
Liu ping fan writes:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
> wrote:
>> Liu ping fan writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] p
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> Liu ping fan writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>>
This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm:
Numa faults supp
Liu ping fan writes:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>
>>> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: Numa
>>> faults support for ppc64"
>>>
>>> For this series, I apply the same idea from t
On 15.01.2014, at 07:36, Liu ping fan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>
>>> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: Numa
>>> faults support for ppc64"
>>>
>>> For this series,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>
>> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: Numa
>> faults support for ppc64"
>>
>> For this series, I apply the same idea from the previous thread "[PATCH 0/3]
On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: Numa
> faults support for ppc64"
>
> For this series, I apply the same idea from the previous thread "[PATCH 0/3]
> optimize for powerpc _PAGE_NUMA"
> (for which, I still try
This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: Numa
faults support for ppc64"
For this series, I apply the same idea from the previous thread "[PATCH 0/3]
optimize for powerpc _PAGE_NUMA"
(for which, I still try to get a machine to show nums)
But for this series, I think
13 matches
Mail list logo