On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan <kernelf...@gmail.com> wrote: > This series is based on Aneesh's series "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: Numa > faults support for ppc64" > > For this series, I apply the same idea from the previous thread "[PATCH 0/3] > optimize for powerpc _PAGE_NUMA" > (for which, I still try to get a machine to show nums) > > But for this series, I think that I have a good justification -- the fact of > heavy cost when switching context between guest and host, > which is well known.
This cover letter isn't really telling me anything. Please put a proper description of what you're trying to achieve, why you're trying to achieve what you're trying and convince your readers that it's a good idea to do it the way you do it. > If my suppose is correct, will CCing k...@vger.kernel.org from next version. This translates to me as "This is an RFC"? Alex _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
