On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:23:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > >
> > > On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:18:59PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > >> From: Kai Jiang
> > >>
> > >> To supp
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> From: Kai Jiang
> >>
> >> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> >> extend th
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> From: Kai Jiang
>>
>> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
>> extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
>> embedded PP
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:36:33PM -0600, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:31:45PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > From: Kai Jiang
> > >
> > > To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> > > e
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:31:45PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > From: Kai Jiang
> >
> > To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> > extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> From: Kai Jiang
>
> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
> embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physi
From: Kai Jiang
To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physical
address than logical.
Since 'addr' may contain a physical, logica
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> You deleted this part:
>
> config PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>def_bool 64BIT || ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>
> which enforces that PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is enabled if 64BIT is set.
Ok, I didn't catch that before, but it makes sense now. Thanks.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel d
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 16:10, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>>
>>> Do we believe phys_addr_t is always greater than or equal to size need for
>>> logical & virtual addresses?
>>
>> Yes:
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>> typedef u
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
>> Do we believe phys_addr_t is always greater than or equal to size need for
>> logical & virtual addresses?
>
> Yes:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> typedef u64 phys_addr_t;
> #else
> typedef u32 phys_addr_t;
> #endif
This isn
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:40:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> From: Kai Jiang
> >>>
> >>> To support >32
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > From: Kai Jiang
> >
> > To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> > extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> From: Kai Jiang
>
> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
> embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physi
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:07:09AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> From: Kai Jiang
> >>
> >> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> >> extend t
On Oct 12, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:40:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala w
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> From: Kai Jiang
>>>
>>> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
>>> extend the widt
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 18:07, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> From: Kai Jiang
>>>
>>> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
>>> extend the width of 'addr' in
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> From: Kai Jiang
>>
>> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
>> extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
>> embedded P
From: Kai Jiang
To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem. Numerous platforms like
embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physical
address than logical.
Since 'addr' may contain a physical, logica
21 matches
Mail list logo
