On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > >> Do we believe phys_addr_t is always greater than or equal to size need for >> logical & virtual addresses? > > Yes: > > #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > typedef u64 phys_addr_t; > #else > typedef u32 phys_addr_t; > #endif
This isn't really an answer to the question. This just says that phys_addr_t can be 64-bit. I don't see anywhere in the kernel that we *enforce* or *require* that sizeof(phys_addr_t) >= sizeof(void *). -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
