On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 18:49 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Optimize MPIC IPIs, by passing in the IPI number as the argument to the
> handler, since all we did was translate it back based on which mpic
> the interrupt came though on (and that was always the primary mpic).
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Olo
Optimize MPIC IPIs, by passing in the IPI number as the argument to the
handler, since all we did was translate it back based on which mpic
the interrupt came though on (and that was always the primary mpic).
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:31:3
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 09:17:39AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:51 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik pointed out that we don't actually have to lookup the mpic
> > instance since it's passed in as the interrupt handler data for IPIs.
>
> Note that's
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:51 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Jeff Garzik pointed out that we don't actually have to lookup the mpic
> instance since it's passed in as the interrupt handler data for IPIs.
Note that's typically one of the annoying case where we use "irq"
for a good reasons, getting t
Jeff Garzik pointed out that we don't actually have to lookup the mpic
instance since it's passed in as the interrupt handler data for IPIs.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
index e479388..6bf56f4 100644
--- a/
