On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:51 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Jeff Garzik pointed out that we don't actually have to lookup the mpic
> instance since it's passed in as the interrupt handler data for IPIs.
Note that's typically one of the annoying case where we use "irq"
for a good reasons, getting the way of Jeff attempt at removing
this argument.
I suppose a working approach would be to have 4 mpic IPI handlers...
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> index e479388..6bf56f4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> @@ -612,11 +612,10 @@ static inline void mpic_eoi(struct mpic *mpic)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -static irqreturn_t mpic_ipi_action(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +static irqreturn_t mpic_ipi_action(int irq, void *data)
> {
> - struct mpic *mpic;
> + struct mpic *mpic = data;
>
> - mpic = mpic_find(irq, NULL);
> smp_message_recv(mpic_irq_to_hw(irq) - mpic->ipi_vecs[0]);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
