On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:53 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 11:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of
> > syscalls.
> >
> > We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
> >
> > __NR_syscalls is
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:28 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 11/23/15, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 12:15 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> > > On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> > > > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of
> > > > syscalls.
> > >
On 11/23/15, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 12:15 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>> On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
>
>> > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of
>> > syscalls.
>> >
>> > We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_sys
On 11/19/2015 11:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of syscalls.
>
> We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
>
> __NR_syscalls is not used outside arch code, whereas NR_syscalls is. So as
> NR_syscalls must b
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 12:15 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of
> > syscalls.
> >
> > We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
> >
> > __NR_syscalls is not used outs
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 15:29 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 02:45 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> > On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> > > > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the
> > > > number of
> > > > syscalls.
> > > >
> > > > We use __NR_syscalls, and then d
On 11/19/2015 02:45 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
>> > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of
>> > syscalls.
>> >
>> > We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
>> >
>> > __NR_syscalls is not used outside arch
On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of
> syscalls.
>
> We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
>
> __NR_syscalls is not used outside arch code, whereas NR_syscalls is. So as
> NR_syscalls must be defined
Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of syscalls.
We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
__NR_syscalls is not used outside arch code, whereas NR_syscalls is. So as
NR_syscalls must be defined and __NR_syscalls does not, replace __NR_syscall
