On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 12:15 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: > On 11/19/15, Rashmica Gupta <rashm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of > > syscalls. > > > > We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls. > > > > __NR_syscalls is not used outside arch code, whereas NR_syscalls is. So as > > NR_syscalls must be defined and __NR_syscalls does not, replace > > __NR_syscalls with NR_syscalls. > > Hi, > > But what's wrong with the current code? Why do we need such change? The change log explains it fairly well I think. Which part is not clear? cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
