On Monday 15 June 2009, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040
> > bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
>
> What's so bad about a frame size larger than 1024?
>
It's not necessarily a
> Yeah that occured to me, someone with a chrp machine would need to test
> it, do we have one?
Yup, I think we do. I'll check that when I'm in the office.
> > We can have a closer look tomorrow. In any case, stack alloc for that is
> > indeed fishy.
>
> The obvious patch to make it static does
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040 bytes
> is larger than 1024 bytes
What's so bad about a frame size larger than 1024?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
_
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:40 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Currently this appears to break only one of the defconfigs, chrp32.
> >
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1907/
> >
> > And that's a legitimate error AFAICT:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: th
> Currently this appears to break only one of the defconfigs, chrp32.
>
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1907/
>
> And that's a legitimate error AFAICT:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040 bytes
> is larger than 1024 bytes
>
> From:
>
> 367 vo
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 16:48 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Add the option to build the code under arch/powerpc with -Werror.
>
> The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
> warnings in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
> if a warning is int
Add the option to build the code under arch/powerpc with -Werror.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
warnings in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is introduced, people can easily work around it while it's
being fixed.
Th
On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc
with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly
introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc code. It n
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:01:33AM +, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:27 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
> > > -Werror, which cause
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:41:38 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> > This is really only beneficial if various people build for powerpc often
> > enough. If major subsystem maintainers aren't going to hit the errors
> > it's more of a hinderanc
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
> > -Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
> >
> > The intention is to make it harder for people
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:27 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
> > -Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
> >
> > The intention is to make it ha
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:28:30PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Olof Johansson
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:27:43 -0500
>
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
> >> -Werror, which caus
From: Olof Johansson
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:27:43 -0500
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
>> -Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
>>
>> The intention is to make it har
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:41PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
> -Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
>
> The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
> errors in the arch/pow
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is introduced, p
On Apr 5, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/
Makefile
index 0c16ab9..dcb2148 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_WERROR),y)
+EXTRA_CFLA
Add an option, on by default, to build all code under arch/powerpc with
-Werror, which causes gcc to treat warnings as errors.
The intention is to make it harder for people to inadvertantly introduce
errors in the arch/powerpc code. It needs to be configurable so that
if a warning is introduced, p
18 matches
Mail list logo
