On Jul 10, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
The mpc7448hpc2 board doesn't have an alias block like
most of the other modern eval boards have. We need this
block in order to have u-boot be able to make use of the
CONFIG_OF_STDOUT_VIA_ALIAS (vs. having a hard coded node)
in the future.
A
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 +0800, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The mpc7448hpc2 board doesn't have an alias block like
> most of the other modern eval boards have. We need this
> block in order to have u-boot be able to make use of the
> CONFIG_OF_STDOUT_VIA_ALIAS (vs. having a hard coded node)
> i
Scott Wood wrote:
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Well, for the mpc7448hpc2, I can say for sure that there are
chosen-duplicating versions of u-boot 1.3.1 in use -- since
there wasn't a prebuilt, validated image newer than 1.1.3(?)
available anywhere back some 6 months ago, I'd built 1.3.1
and made it ava
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Well, for the mpc7448hpc2, I can say for sure that there are
chosen-duplicating versions of u-boot 1.3.1 in use -- since
there wasn't a prebuilt, validated image newer than 1.1.3(?)
available anywhere back some 6 months ago, I'd built 1.3.1
and made it available with our 2.6
Scott Wood wrote:
Jon Loeliger wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
OK, so does that mean that the cuboot wrapper is explicitly
not supported for all the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx boards?
No (except 86xx, which doesn't have cuboot, because it never existed
in arch/ppc and thus there's
Jon Loeliger wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
OK, so does that mean that the cuboot wrapper is explicitly
not supported for all the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx boards?
No (except 86xx, which doesn't have cuboot, because it never existed
in arch/ppc and thus there's no compatibility to
Scott Wood wrote:
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
OK, so does that mean that the cuboot wrapper is explicitly
not supported for all the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx boards?
No (except 86xx, which doesn't have cuboot, because it never existed in
arch/ppc and thus there's no compatibility to maintain), it just m
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
OK, so does that mean that the cuboot wrapper is explicitly
not supported for all the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx boards?
No (except 86xx, which doesn't have cuboot, because it never existed in
arch/ppc and thus there's no compatibility to maintain), it just means
that chosen w
Scott Wood wrote:
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
The mpc7448hpc2 board doesn't have an alias block like
most of the other modern eval boards have. We need this
block in order to have u-boot be able to make use of the
CONFIG_OF_STDOUT_VIA_ALIAS (vs. having a hard coded node)
in the future.
Also remove t
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
The mpc7448hpc2 board doesn't have an alias block like
most of the other modern eval boards have. We need this
block in order to have u-boot be able to make use of the
CONFIG_OF_STDOUT_VIA_ALIAS (vs. having a hard coded node)
in the future.
Also remove the old, redundant c
The mpc7448hpc2 board doesn't have an alias block like
most of the other modern eval boards have. We need this
block in order to have u-boot be able to make use of the
CONFIG_OF_STDOUT_VIA_ALIAS (vs. having a hard coded node)
in the future.
Also remove the old, redundant chosen node. Of all the
11 matches
Mail list logo
