Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from
i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from
>>> i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC. If a
>>> i2c
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 7/16/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > Jean Delvare wrote:
> >
Yep, as pr
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 7/16/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > > > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > > > Yep, a
On 7/16/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > >
>
> > > Yep, as probing might not be acceptable in some cases, I makes sense to
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > Jean Delvare wrote:
> >
> > Yep, as probing might not be acceptable in some cases, I makes sense to
> > add a property to suppress probing:
>
> It'd rather make no-p
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
The problem is that at this point in time, only a couple hwmon drivers
have been converted to new-style i2c. So, dropping the I2C_CLASS_HWMON
would break most systems.
I have a set of patches
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > The problem is that at this point in time, only a couple hwmon drivers
> > have been converted to new-style i2c. So, dropping the I2C_CLASS_HWMON
> > would break most systems.
> >
> > I have a set of patches c
Hi Jean;
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:12:50 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
For hwmon chips, probing only occurs if the i2c adapter accepts to be
probed, by setting the I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag in i2c_adapter.class. If
you do not want a given i2c b
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:12:50 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > For hwmon chips, probing only occurs if the i2c adapter accepts to be
> > probed, by setting the I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag in i2c_adapter.class. If
> > you do not want a given i2c bus to be probed, the
Hi Jean,
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:40:58 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
There's no "detection" involved for the new-style i2c devices.
Presumably you are still using the old binding model, not taking
benefit of the patch at all. Use i2c_reg
11 matches
Mail list logo
