On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > On 7/16/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > > > > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yep, as probing might not be acceptable in some cases, I makes sense to > > > > add a property to suppress probing: > > > > > > It'd rather make no-probing the default if possible. My understanding > > > is that all systems using i2c-mpc should have proper platform data. > > > > > > Total ACK. From my perspective, probing should be off by default because > > the > > typical use case in powerpc land is to trust data in the device tree. Add > > the > > property to turn on probing, not to turn it off. Also, you'll need to > > document the semantics of such a property. ie. what exactly does it > > mean when the probing property is present and the spi bus node has child > > nodes? > > I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from > i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC. If a > i2c client hasn't been converted to the new model yet, convert it > before deploying with the new i2c-mpc driver. It's not very hard to > convert the client drivers.
I tend to agree. And the number of unconverted drivers is getting very low these days. Only 2 RTC drivers are left, and by the end of the day, almost all hwmon drivers will be converted as well. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
