On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:28:38 +0100
Segher Boessenkool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> As for the DTS, maybe a "compatible" property in the CPU might make
> >>> some
> >>> sense with a content along the lines of "ppc440x6" or whatever rev of
> >>> the 440 core it is.
> >>>
> >>> What do you think
As for the DTS, maybe a "compatible" property in the CPU might make
some
sense with a content along the lines of "ppc440x6" or whatever rev of
the 440 core it is.
What do you think ?
Good idea. I'll try to come up with a list for all existing 4xx SoC's
and it's
core versions.
I don't reall
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:54:33 +0100
Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:15 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> > > + device_type = "cpu";
> > > +
BTW, Should we sort compatible from the most specific to the most
specific or the other way around ?
Most specific first.
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 12:46 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > As for the DTS, maybe a "compatible" property in the CPU might make
> > some
> > sense with a content along the lines of "ppc440x6" or whatever rev of
> > the 440 core it is.
>
> Good idea, but please _also_ put the exact name in t
As for the DTS, maybe a "compatible" property in the CPU might make
some
sense with a content along the lines of "ppc440x6" or whatever rev of
the 440 core it is.
Good idea, but please _also_ put the exact name in there, first; so
something like
compatible = "AMCC,PowerPC,460GT", "AMCC
On Friday 21 March 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:15 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + model = "PowerPC,460GT";
> > + reg = <0>;
>
> I
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:15 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + model = "PowerPC,460GT";
> + reg = <0>;
>
I wonder if we should do something here to differenciate the SoC c
The patch adds the Glacier dts. The Glacier is nearly identical to the
Canyonlands (460EX). Here the differences:
- 4 ethernet ports instead of 2
- no SATA port
- no USB port
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/glacier.dts | 464
