On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 12:46 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > As for the DTS, maybe a "compatible" property in the CPU might make > > some > > sense with a content along the lines of "ppc440x6" or whatever rev of > > the 440 core it is. > > Good idea, but please _also_ put the exact name in there, first; so > something like > > compatible = "AMCC,PowerPC,460GT", "AMCC,ppc440x6"; > > That way, you can still probe for specific versions where necessary. > This is completely in line with the "generic naming" recommended > practice; the PowerPC binding predates that RP, it really needs to > be updated. > > Any reason we keep the device_type here, btw?
BTW, Should we sort compatible from the most specific to the most specific or the other way around ? Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
