On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:52:44AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:36:32AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to
> >> support for the TQM85xx modules. Unfortu
Hi Anton,
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:36:32AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to
>> support for the TQM85xx modules. Unfortunately, the hardware does
>> not support the R/B pins of the NAND chip and theref
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2008, at 1:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
>> This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to
>> support for the TQM85xx modules. Unfortunately, the hardware does
>> not support the R/B pins of the NAND chip and therefore the specified
>> ma
On May 30, 2008, at 1:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to
support for the TQM85xx modules. Unfortunately, the hardware does
not support the R/B pins of the NAND chip and therefore the specified
maximum delay time must used. It the
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:36:32AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to
> support for the TQM85xx modules. Unfortunately, the hardware does
> not support the R/B pins of the NAND chip and therefore the specified
> maximum delay time
This patch extends the FSL UPM NAND driver from Anton Vorontsov to
support for the TQM85xx modules. Unfortunately, the hardware does
not support the R/B pins of the NAND chip and therefore the specified
maximum delay time must used. It therefore re-introduces the chip-delay
property.
Note: this pa
