This patch enables the ethtool interface. The implementation is done
using the libphy helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
---
drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c | 27 +++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net
Hello Wolfgang
>
> This is with a 4xx core, right? Is this the same SPI controller design
> like in AMCC's 40x and 44x cores, i. e. with a "FIFO" of depth 1?
It is a ppc440 but it is does not have ans spi controller as in the
amcc. The spi controller is a xilinx core allocated at the plb bus,
in
Hello
Thanks for your reply
> Is the I/O logged from within the Xilinx-SPI-Driver or from within the
> mmc-spi-layer?
It is take from inside the spi driver.
>
> The response to CMD10 seems quite strange to me. The R1 answer to that
> command says that everything is OK, so what is done next is
Hello,
It seems that I am facing the same problem!. I attach another trace
that also shows the sd I/O.
I have also commented out the dma line at probe and no better results
As you point, the card is unable to reply the cid. But not only
that, after that failure the card replyies allway
Hello
>
> Ah! After writing my original reply, I read the documentation,
> and this had me confused.
>
> 4b08e14 looks wrong to me. It also didn't update the documentation.
So, what shall we do, revert 4b08e14 or apply this patch changing the
name to "linux,mtd,partition" or similar ?
Hello Segher
Thanks for your comments.
>
> Your special "partition" isn't really a partition then, is it.
> Because of that, device nodes to represent your partitions doesn't
> work very well.
I think that they work pretty well. Unfortunately, since
4b08e149c0e02e97ec49c2a31d14a0d3a02f8074 all
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the
partitions. Like in:
partit...@ff00 {
reg = < 0x00 0x80 >;
label = "Root File System";
};
partit...@ff80 {
reg = < 0x80 0x1a >;
label = "Bitstream";
};
...
f...@ff00
Hello Scott
It is definitively more elegant...
Let me send tomorrow a patch
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 20:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>
>> Hi Scott
>>
>>> Perhaps "compatible" should be used instead?
>>
>> Wha
Hello Benjamin
> Hi Recardo,
>
> I would suggest to do:
>
> if (strcmp(partname, "partition") <= 0) {
Anything alfabetically higher than partition (like "z" will pass
the test :S)
Regards
>
> cheers
> ben
>
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
Hi Scott
> Perhaps "compatible" should be used instead?
What do you mean?
if (strcmp(partname, "partition") || strcmp(partname, "compatible") )
I can't see the advantages.
>
>> Hi Recardo,
>>
>> I would suggest to do:
>>
>> if (strcmp(partname, "partition") <= 0) {
>
> Check wh
Hello
You are right, remove the -1. I thought that strlen gives the #of
chars + 1 ('\0').
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Ricardo" == Ricardo Ribalda Delgado writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ricardo> Some
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the
partitions. Like in:
partit...@ff00 {
reg = < 0x00 0x80 >;
label = "Root File System";
};
partit...@ff80 {
reg = < 0x80 0x1a >;
label = "Bitstream";
};
...
partition
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the
partitions. Like in:
partit...@ff00 {
reg = < 0x00 0x80 >;
label = "Root File System";
};
partit...@ff80 {
reg = < 0x80 0x1a >;
label = "Bitstream";
};
...
parti
Hello list
I have tried to port Linux 2.6 (xilinx git) to a XUPV2P board
running a system implemented with EDK10.1 (Linux Version). I have
fail, and I think I now why, this is a little report written for
saving you some time (and maybe solving my problem if I am doing
something wrong)
The boar
14 matches
Mail list logo
