On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:12:01AM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > why aren't these callers using kthread_create_on_cpu()? That API was
>
> It is using that. There just are other data structures
Hi Tejun,
[I found the other thread where you made these points, thanks you for
expressing them so clearly again!]
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:42:29AM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > So, to be clear, this i
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:09:23PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > [Apologies for the large Cc list, but I believe we have the following
> > interested parties:
> >
> > x86 (recently posted memoryless node support)
> > ia64 (ex
[ Apologies for replying from a different address, we have a service outage
at work. ]
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> Hi,
Thank you for your response!
> I'm curious about what will it happen when
alloc_pages_node(memoryless_node).
alloc_pages_node() is only involved
On 1/27/08, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-27 22:55:43]:
>
> > Balbir Singh writes:
> >
> > > Here's a better and more complete fix for the problem. Could you
> > > please see if it works for you? I tested it on a real NUMA box and it
> > > s
On 1/22/08, Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/slab-20080122/partial-revert-slab-changes.patch
> > .. Can you please check on your machine if it fixes your problem?
>
> It does not fix or change the nature of the crash
On 1/18/08, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you try this patch?
>
> Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support
> HIGHMEM
>
> It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to s
On 11/28/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 11/28/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:03:10 -0600 Jon Tollefson wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch adds the hugepagesz boot-ti
On 11/28/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:03:10 -0600 Jon Tollefson wrote:
>
> > This patch adds the hugepagesz boot-time parameter for ppc64 that lets
> > you pick the size for your huge pages. The choices available are 64K
> > and 16M. It defaults to 16M (pre
On 10/5/07, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >
> &
On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
> > particularly good name for the variable anymore.
>
> Sure, what about?
>
> Clarify when RTAS logging i
11 matches
Mail list logo
