On 10/5/07, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > > > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a > > > > particularly good name for the variable anymore. > > > > > > Sure, what about? > > > > > > Clarify when RTAS logging is enabled. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For what it's worth, on a different ppc64 box, this resolves a similar > > panic for me. > > > > Tested-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For the reasons explained, I'd really like to nack Tony's patch.
I see. Can you reply in this thread with the patch you mentioned in your other reply? (or point me to a copy of it) Thanks, Nish _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
