Quoting Emil Medve (2015-01-21 02:03:22)
> Based on clk-next from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git
>
> v2: Rebased as several prerequisite patches (including a file rename) got
> applied upstream
>
> Emil Medve (9):
> clk: qoriq: Fix checkpatch type PAR
Quoting yuantian.t...@freescale.com (2015-01-14 22:03:40)
> From: Tang Yuantian
>
> redefine variable clocks_per_pll as a struct member
>
> If there are multiple PLL clock nodes, this variable will
> get overwritten. Redefining it as a struct member can avoid that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuant
Quoting Kevin Hao (2014-12-08 17:34:15)
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:51:59PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > This patch is going to conflict with commit a4ae8f3b0f7ac6ab3 "clk: drop
> > owner assignment from platform_drivers" in linux-next -- or rather,
> > you've based this on that patch, but it's no
Quoting Scott Wood (2014-11-06 20:07:43)
> On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 14:11 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have done a boot test on p2014rdb and t4240qds boards. I don't have an
> > access
> > to mpc512x board, so only build test for that.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Revert the commit da788acb2838
Quoting Scott Wood (2014-09-25 15:56:20)
> On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 15:54 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Scott Wood (2014-09-25 13:08:00)
> > > Well, like I said, I'd rather see the CLK_OF_DECLARE stuff be made to
> > > work on PPC rather than have the
Quoting Scott Wood (2014-09-25 13:08:00)
> Well, like I said, I'd rather see the CLK_OF_DECLARE stuff be made to
> work on PPC rather than have the driver carry around two binding
> methods.
I guess that is an existing problem, and not related directly to this
patch? This patch is essentially just
Quoting Jingchang Lu (2014-09-22 23:46:46)
> The IP is shared by PPC and ARM, this renames it to qoriq for better
> represention, and this also adds the CLK_OF_DECLARE support for being
> initialized by of_clk_init() on ARM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu
> ---
> changes in v4:
> remove "corene
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2014-09-03 08:31:57)
> In preparation to change the public API to return a per-user clk structure,
> remove any usage of this public API from the clock implementations.
>
> The reason for having this in a separate commit from the one that introduces
> the implementation of th
Quoting Stephen Warren (2014-07-31 10:51:20)
> On 07/31/2014 05:47 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On 07/22/2014 07:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 07/17/2014 08:13 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >>> Adds a way for clock consumers to set maximum and minimum rates. This
> >>> can be
> >>> used for therm
Quoting Scott Wood (2014-03-19 14:52:23)
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:32:45AM +0800, tang yuantian wrote:
> > From: Tang Yuantian
> >
> > The clock bindings for Freescale CoreNet platform are updated.
> > So, the driver needs to be updated accordingly.
> > The main changes include:
> > - Ad
-next,
> available at git://git.denx.de/linux-2.6-agust.git next)
>
> this series does not address the issue of outdated or missing device
> tree binding documentation for MPC512x peripherals -- that's the scope
> of a pending separate series
For the three clock patch
Quoting Anatolij Gustschin (2013-08-23 15:05:39)
> On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:30:00 -0700
> Mike Turquette wrote:
>
> > Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40)
> > > the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development
> > > and apparently
2 of August 2013 15:43:31 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Sascha Hauer (2013-08-22 14:00:35)
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:09:31PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013
Quoting Sascha Hauer (2013-08-22 14:00:35)
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:09:31PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:19:10AM +0100, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Tomasz Figa (2013-08-21 14:34:55)
> > > > On Wednesday 21 of August 20
Quoting Tomasz Figa (2013-08-21 14:34:55)
> On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 09:50:15 Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:06:25AM +0100, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Mark Rutland (2013-08-19 02:35:43)
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013
Quoting Mark Rutland (2013-08-19 02:35:43)
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 04:17:18PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 of August 2013 16:53:16 Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > > > Also I would make this option required. Use a dum
Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-08-03 07:39:56)
> [ we are strictly talking about clocks and source code again,
> I have trimmed the CC: list to not spam the device tree ML or
> subsystem maintainers ]
>
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 16:30 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >
>
Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:44)
> this change implements a clock driver for the MPC512x PowerPC platform
> which follows the COMMON_CLK approach and uses common clock drivers
> shared with other platforms
>
> this driver implements the publicly announced set of clocks (which can
> get
gt;
> these specs map 'clock-names' encoded in drivers to their respective
> 'struct clk' items in the platform's clock driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Sittig
Reviewed-by: Mike Turquette
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121.dtsi | 79
> +
Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-23 06:14:06)
> [ summary: "shared gate" support desirable? approach acceptable? ]
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 14:14 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >
> > this change implements a clock driver for the MPC512x PowerPC platform
> > which follows the COMMON_CLK approach
> the reference design (25MHz xtal, 80MHz IPS bus)
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Sittig
Reviewed-by: Mike Turquette
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ac14xx.dts |7 +++
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121.dtsi | 15 ++-
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1
e an enum but
> + * needs to be a list of #define directives since when referenced from
> + * within DTS files they need to get resolved "at compile time".
Above comment is not really necessary. Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Mike Turquette
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _DT_
Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40)
> the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development
> and apparently assume little endian peripherals
>
> wrap register/peripherals access in the common code (div, gate, mux)
> in preparation of adding COMMON_CLK support for other pla
Quoting Nicolas Pitre (2013-07-18 10:47:22)
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > 1. clk_get() and clk_put() are NOT part of the common clock API.
> >They're separate - they're part of the clk API, and the infrastructure
> >behind that is clkdev, which is a separatel
Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-05-30 12:26:38)
> On May 30, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>
> > Quoting Mike Turquette (2013-05-30 11:57:32)
> >> Quoting yuantian.t...@freescale.com (2013-05-22 01:22:19)
> >>> From: Tang Yuantian
> >>>
> &g
Quoting Mike Turquette (2013-05-30 11:57:32)
> Quoting yuantian.t...@freescale.com (2013-05-22 01:22:19)
> > From: Tang Yuantian
> >
> > The compatible string of clock is changed from *-2 to *-2.0
> > on chassis 2. So updated it accordingly.
> >
> > Signed
Quoting yuantian.t...@freescale.com (2013-05-22 01:22:19)
> From: Tang Yuantian
>
> The compatible string of clock is changed from *-2 to *-2.0
> on chassis 2. So updated it accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian
Taken into clk-next.
Regards,
Mike
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-ppc-corenet.
Quoting yuantian.t...@freescale.com (2013-04-09 01:46:26)
> From: Tang Yuantian
>
> This adds the clock driver for Freescale PowerPC corenet
> series SoCs using common clock infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang
Patch #1 looks good to me. I've taken it int
Quoting Tang Yuantian-B29983 (2013-04-15 23:59:34)
> Hi Mike,
>
> I really appreciate if you can spend some times to review this patch.
>
Yauntian,
Thanks for submitting this patch. I have frozen the changes I plan to
submit for 3.10, with the exception of any last-minute fixes. I'll take
a c
29 matches
Mail list logo