Quoting Anatolij Gustschin (2013-08-23 15:05:39)
> On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:30:00 -0700
> Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Quoting Gerhard Sittig (2013-07-22 05:14:40)
> > > the common clock drivers were motivated/initiated by ARM development
> > > and apparently assume little endian peripherals
> > > 
> > > wrap register/peripherals access in the common code (div, gate, mux)
> > > in preparation of adding COMMON_CLK support for other platforms
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Gerhard Sittig <g...@denx.de>
> > 
> > I've taken this into clk-next for testing. regmap deserves investigation
> > but I don't think your series should be blocked on that. We can always
> > overhaul the basic clock primitives with regmap support later on if that
> > makes sense.
> 
> Mike, I cannot see it in clk-next branch of
> git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git
> 
> Can you please check? Or am I looking in the wrong place?

You were looking in the right place but I had not pushed out the latest
patches from my local branch. It should be there now.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Thanks,
> Anatolij
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to