Scott,
It seems the old name "mpc82xx ads" is still used in your code.
It will be nice that your file name match your code name, you know, less
confusion.
Thanks
Mark Zhan
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 20:35 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:06 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Mark Zhan wrote:
> > Yes, basically I agree what you say. That should be the right way.
> >
> > but, the current situation is that: in all DTS files that are using smc
> > or scc as u
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:06 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Mark Zhan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 03:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 16 July 2007, Mark Zhan wrote:
> > > > - cpm_uart_data.uart_clk = ppc_proc_fr
cause some
> > legacy u-boot for this board probably was setting up the wrong memory
> > map.
>
> Hmm, will those legacy u-boot version be able to even boot this kernel?
> The device tree looks like it needs to have some variables set by u-boot,
> so I'd guess you don't need to worry about old versions that don't
> set those either.
Actually, the current u-boot 1.2.0 for this board is ported from that
legacy one, and I don't check the details to assure that u-boot's setup
is all right. So here I just want to double assure everything goes
correct.
Thanks
Mark Zhan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 03:27 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > +static struct resource m48t59_resources[] = {
> > + {
> > + .start = SBCPQ2_RTC_BASE,
> > + .end= SBCPQ2_RTC_BASE + SBCPQ2_RTC_SIZE - 1,
> > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > + }, {
> > +
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 02:59 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007, Mark Zhan wrote:
>
> > @@ -96,7 +94,7 @@
> > pvid = mfspr(SPRN_PVR);
> > svid = mfspr(SPRN_SVR);
> >
> > - seq_printf(m, "Vendor\t\t: Freescale Semiconductor\n&q
Hi Vitaly,
When you will send out your 8xx/82xx series patches?
Thanks
Mark Zhan
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 04:44 +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:01:28 +0800
> Mark Zhan wrote:
>
> > These 3 patches add the powerpc support of Wind River SBC
> > PowerQUICC
Hello Arnd,
I think, the function of_find_compatible_node(), which is called in the
for loop, has already done that. So definitely, no need to call
of_device_is_compatible() any more.
Thanks
Mark Zhan
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 03:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007, Mark Z
This patch addes the powerpc support to Wind River SBC PowerQUICCII 82xx board.
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sbcpq2.dts | 191 +++
arch/powerpc/configs/sbcpq2_defconfig | 917
++
arch/powerpc/platform
Some mpc82xx platform hooks in mpc82xx_ads.c are actually not specific to ads
board, they could be shared by different
82xx boards.
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx.c | 30 +++
arch/powerpc/platform
This patch makes 'cpm_uart_of_init' be able to parses SMC serial device node in
DTS
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c | 37 -
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: linux-po
e to parse SMC uart in DTS
3) The 3rd patch is the platform codes, defconfig and dts for Wind River SBC
PowerQUICCII 82xx board.
Any comment is welcome.
Thanks
Mark Zhan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailma
12 matches
Mail list logo