On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:06 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Mark Zhan wrote: > > Yes, basically I agree what you say. That should be the right way. > > > > but, the current situation is that: in all DTS files that are using smc > > or scc as uart device, all device node definitions have the same > > "compatible" property -- "cpm_uart" > > > > So what I do here is just following the upstream source tree. > > > > Well, AFAICS, all of them currently use scc. The 8xx platforms don't > even build correctly in the mainline kernel, so I guess it would > be good to change them to also list fsl,cpm-smc in the compatible > property.
That probably could be done by another series of patches, and I really don't want to introduce those kinds of patches in my BSP patches. I don't know if the 8xx/82xx series patches from Scott Wood will cover this issue or not. We can wait for them to see where thing will go. Thanks mark zhan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
