Re: [PATCH OF 07/14] of: move of_irq_map_pci() into generic code

2011-02-16 Thread Michal Simek
Grant Likely wrote: On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior There is a tiny difference between PPC32 and PPC64. Microblaze uses the PPC32 variant. Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Seba

Re: [RFC] Inter-processor Mailboxes Drivers

2011-02-16 Thread Linus Walleij
2011/2/15 Blanchard, Hollis : > OpenMCAPI (http://openmcapi.org) implements the MCAPI specification, > which is a simple application-level communication API that uses shared > memory. The API could be layered over any protocol, but was more or less > designed for simple shared-memory systems, e.g.

Re: [PATCH OF 07/14] of: move of_irq_map_pci() into generic code

2011-02-16 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > There is a tiny difference between PPC32 and PPC64. Microblaze uses the > PPC32 variant. > > Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > Signed-off-by: Sebastian And

Re: [openmcapi-dev] Re: [RFC] Inter-processor Mailboxes Drivers

2011-02-16 Thread Blanchard, Hollis
On 02/15/2011 10:22 PM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > From: "ext Blanchard, Hollis" > Subject: Re: [RFC] Inter-processor Mailboxes Drivers > Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:38:25 -0800 > >> On 02/15/2011 01:58 PM, Meador Inge wrote: >>> On 02/14/2011 04:01 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:19

Re: Using CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START

2011-02-16 Thread Meador Inge
On 02/16/2011 01:24 PM, Scott Wood wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:25 -0600 Meador Inge wrote: Hi Kumar, Quick question about the support for booting at a non-zero base address (as committed here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=37dd2badcfcec35f5e2

Re: Using CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START

2011-02-16 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:00:25 -0600 Meador Inge wrote: > Hi Kumar, > > Quick question about the support for booting at a non-zero base address > (as committed here: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=37dd2badcfcec35f5e21a0926968d77a404f03c3). > > I

Bug in arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_gtm.c

2011-02-16 Thread Jean-Denis Boyer
Hi. There is a bug in the function gtm_set_ref_timer16. When called, it correctly sets the requested timer, but the other timer that shares the register GTCFR is reset. The parameter 'clear' passed to macro clrsetbits_8 should not be a bitwise complement, since the macro already complements it. H

Using CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START

2011-02-16 Thread Meador Inge
Hi Kumar, Quick question about the support for booting at a non-zero base address (as committed here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=37dd2badcfcec35f5e21a0926968d77a404f03c3). Is booting from a non-zero address as simple as changing "CONFIG_PHYSIC

Re: Question about flash allocation

2011-02-16 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Mitsutaka Amano wrote: > Hi, > > Why does CFI(or other flash memory) have to alloc amount of flash > memory size to the vmalloc area(such as PHYSMAP or PHYSMAP_OF)? > I wondered other devices seems to not allocating(e.g, most NAND flash, > flash on ARM, MIPS and s