On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 07:31:15AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> - add binding to OF, compatible name "smi,sm501"
>
> - add read/write functions for using this driver
> also on powerpc plattforms
>
> - add commandline options:
> sm501.fb_mode:
> Specify resolution as "x[-][@]"
> sm501.
On 01/03/2011 02:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:58:09 -0600
Perhaps a something like this, with "doorbell" being a new standard
hw-independent service with its own binding:
msg1: mpic-...@1400 {
compatible = "fsl,mpic-v3.0-msg";
reg =<0x1400 0x200>;
inter
test
--
Alexey Kardashevskiy
IBM OzLabs, LTC Team
e-mail/sametime: a...@au1.ibm.com
notes: Alexey Kardashevskiy/Australia/IBM
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 19:23:33 +0100
michael wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> index dd5ea95..cb67076 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
> #define _PAGE_FIL
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:53:27PM -0800, Blanchard, Hollis wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 03:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Device nodes with the property status="disabled" are not usable and so
> > don't register them when parsing the device tree for devices.
> >
> This is great and all, but a fair amoun
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:49:40 -0800
"Blanchard, Hollis" wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 02:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:58:55 -0600
> > Meador Inge wrote:
> >
> >> We need some sort of mapping between a message register and a message
> >> register number so that the message registers
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Amit Shah
commit e74d098c66543d0731de62eb747ccd5b636a6f4c upstream.
Alan pointed out a race in the code where hvc_remove is invoked. The
recent virtio_console work is the first user of hvc
On 01/03/2011 03:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Device nodes with the property status="disabled" are not usable and so
> don't register them when parsing the device tree for devices.
>
This is great and all, but a fair amount of driver code explicitly
searches the tree, rather than registering a pro
On 01/05/2011 02:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:58:55 -0600
> Meador Inge wrote:
>
>> We need some sort of mapping between a message register and a message
>> register number so that the message registers can be referenced through
>> some sort of API (e.g. 'mpic_msgr_read(0)').
This patch adds support for handling IO Event interrupts which come
through at the /event-sources/ibm,io-events device tree node.
There is one ibm,io-events interrupt, but this interrupt might be used
for multiple I/O devices, each with their own separate driver. So, we
create a platform interrup
This patch adds IBM specific v6 extended log definition and utilities.
Signed-off-by: Tseng-Hui (Frank) Lin
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig |6 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile|1 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries_event_log.c | 62 +++
This patch adds definitions of non-IBM specific v6 extended log definitions to
rtas.h.
Signed-off-by: Tseng-Hui (Frank) Lin
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h| 45 -
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h b/arc
This series of patches adds support for handling IO Event interrupts which
come through at the /event-sources/ibm,io-events device tree node.
Change log from v1:
- Restructure the patch into 3 patches.
= Move non-IBM specific v6 extended log definition to rtas.h.
= Move IBM specific v6 extend
On 12/23/2010 04:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
This argument has been rehashed many times, but it basically comes
down to compatible values should ideally be anchored to a real
implemented device, not to a family of devices, or to an unversioned
specification.
In practise, the implementation doesn'
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:58:55 -0600
Meador Inge wrote:
> We need some sort of mapping between a message register and a message
> register number so that the message registers can be referenced through
> some sort of API (e.g. 'mpic_msgr_read(0)'). One way to do that would
> be by putting an ord
On 01/03/2011 01:51 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:33:25 -0700
Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:49:54PM -0600, Meador Inge wrote:
How do you
see this working in terms of processing the data? It seems like we
are going to have to be aware of N values instead of 1,
On 01/04/2011 06:13 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:52:38 -0600
Meador Inge wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Scott.
On 01/03/2011 02:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:58:09 -0600
These nodes cannot go under the mpic node, because interrupt
controllers need #address-ce
Hi
On 01/05/2011 07:09 PM, Rafael Beims wrote:
Hello all,
I'm working with an MPC880 board that is supposed to run linux-2.6.32. After
some work, I could get the kernel up and running, mounting a rootfs via
NFS.
The problem that I'm facing now is that when I try to run any process (may
be an ls,
I forgot to copy the list, sorry...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rafael Beims
Date: Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: mpc880 linux-2.6.32 slow running processes
To: michael
Wow! That was fast!
I applied the patch and it worked very well. Now I can use the commands
norma
Hi
On 01/05/2011 07:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Rafael Beims,
In message you
wrote:
I'm working with an MPC880 board that is supposed to run linux-2.6.32. After
some work, I could get the kernel up and running, mounting a rootfs via
NFS.
2.6.32 is pretty old. Is there any specific rea
Hi
On 01/05/2011 07:43 PM, Rafael Beims wrote:
Wow! That was fast!
I applied the patch and it worked very well. Now I can use the commands
normally.
I will be doing more tests in the next days, but it seems that my problem is
solved.
Is this patch already mainstream in newer kernel versions?
Hello Mr. Denk
As I already posted, the patch that was posted before seems to have
solved the problem. Anyway, some answers follow:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> Dear Rafael Beims,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm working with an MPC880 board that is supposed
Dear Rafael Beims,
In message you
wrote:
>
> I'm working with an MPC880 board that is supposed to run linux-2.6.32. After
> some work, I could get the kernel up and running, mounting a rootfs via
> NFS.
2.6.32 is pretty old. Is there any specific reason for not using a
recent kernel version?
Hello all,
I'm working with an MPC880 board that is supposed to run linux-2.6.32. After
some work, I could get the kernel up and running, mounting a rootfs via
NFS.
The problem that I'm facing now is that when I try to run any process (may
be an ls, cat, or whatever), the response of the process is
24 matches
Mail list logo
