On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 19:23:33 +0100
michael <mich...@evidence.eu.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h 
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> index dd5ea95..cb67076 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
>  #define _PAGE_FILE   0x0002  /* when !present: nonlinear file mapping */
>  #define _PAGE_NO_CACHE       0x0002  /* I: cache inhibit */
>  #define _PAGE_SHARED 0x0004  /* No ASID (context) compare */
> -#define _PAGE_SPECIAL        0x0008  /* SW entry, forced to 0 by the TLB 
> miss */
> +#define _PAGE_SPECIAL        0x0000  /* SW entry, forced to 0 by the TLB 
> miss */

What do you think is going wrong with the special bit on 8xx?

Or might the change to set_pte_filter() alone be what fixed the problem?

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> index 5304093..1da03a8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -173,21 +173,29 @@ static pte_t set_pte_filter(pte_t pte, unsigned long 
> addr)
>       pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) & ~_PAGE_HPTEFLAGS);
>       if (pte_looks_normal(pte) && !(cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_COHERENT_ICACHE) 
> ||
>                                      cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE))) {
> -             struct page *pg = maybe_pte_to_page(pte);
> -             if (!pg)
> +             unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
> +             struct page *pg;
> +
> +             if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
>                       return pte;
> -             if (!test_bit(PG_arch_1, &pg->flags)) {
> +
> +             pg = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_8xx
> -                     /* On 8xx, cache control instructions (particularly
> -                      * "dcbst" from flush_dcache_icache) fault as write
> -                      * operation if there is an unpopulated TLB entry
> -                      * for the address in question. To workaround that,
> -                      * we invalidate the TLB here, thus avoiding dcbst
> -                      * misbehaviour.
> -                      */
> -                     /* 8xx doesn't care about PID, size or ind args */
> -                     _tlbil_va(addr, 0, 0, 0);
> +             /* On 8xx, cache control instructions (particularly
> +              * "dcbst" from flush_dcache_icache) fault as write
> +              * operation if there is an unpopulated TLB entry
> +              * for the address in question. To workaround that,
> +              * we invalidate the TLB here, thus avoiding dcbst
> +              * misbehaviour.
> +              */
> +             /* 8xx doesn't care about PID, size or ind args */
> +             _tlbil_va(addr, 0, 0, 0);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_8xx */
> +
> +             if (!pg)
> +                     return pte;
> +
> +             if (!PageReserved(pg) && !test_bit(PG_arch_1, &pg->flags)) {
>                       flush_dcache_icache_page(pg);
>                       set_bit(PG_arch_1, &pg->flags);
>               }

Rex, do you recall under what specific circumstances the _tlbil_va is
needed?  Is it possible that it will be caused by a dcbst in other
contexts that are not dependent on the state of PG_arch_1?

-Scott

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to