> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 10:42 PM
> To: Li Yang-R58472
> Cc: Soohyung Cho; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: suspend-to-mem on the mpc8349e-mitx-gp?
>
> Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> >> However, the code should treat "mem" as "standby" o
On Friday 20 March 2009 17:06:17 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:46 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask.
> >
> > It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
> > (the older ones are d
davidastro writes:
> Basically, the numbers shown above was causing the 64 by 32 bit algorithm to
> divide by zero making the unit spin and also giving incorrect results.
> Here is the code as it was before.
[snip]
> cntlzw r0,r5 # we are shifting the dividend right
> l
From: Anton Vorontsov
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:34:17 +0300
> commit b1c4a9dddf09fe99b8f88252718ac5b357363dc4 ("ucc_geth: Change
> uec phy id to the same format as gianfar's") introduced a regression
> in the ucc_geth driver that causes this oops when fixed-link is used:
>
> Unable to handle ker
Commit e7943fbbfdb6eef03c003b374de1f802cc14f02a broke ppc32 using
Open Firmware client interface due to using the wrong relocation
macro when accessing the variable "linux_banner".
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:36:44PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Did you ever try building it? pasemi_defconfig gives me:
>
> No. I mentioned it in the series header email, but not in the patch
> description. My 64bit build environment i
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 04:29:01PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> From: Grant Likely
>>
>> This patch simplifies the driver by making use of more common code.
>
> Did you ever try building it? pasemi_defconfig gives me:
No. I mentioned it
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:13:06 +0300
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here comes another version, let's hope that one is final. ;-)
>
I think so. I've queued it all for 2.6.30. Thanks :)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish gover
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 04:29:01PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely
>
> This patch simplifies the driver by making use of more common code.
Did you ever try building it? pasemi_defconfig gives me:
drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c: In function 'pasemi_mac_phy_init':
drivers/net/pasemi_mac
