Re: [PATCH] powerpc/cell: fix dependency in cpufreq

2009-02-09 Thread Michael Neuling
> > > cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by > > > cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > > > --- > > > I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really > > > depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PM

[PATCH] shift 64bit unmapped_area to top of address space

2009-02-09 Thread Anton Blanchard
We currently place mmaps just below the stack on 32bit, but leave them in the middle of the address space on 64bit: 0010-0012 r-xp 0010 00:00 0[vdso] 1000-1001 r-xp 08:06 179534 /tmp/sleep 1001-1002 rw-p 08:06 179534

linux2.6.23-rc2 build errors--kernel/traps.c

2009-02-09 Thread Li Jun (Aaron)
Hi, When I make zImage, the errors below came out. Any tips? [linux-2.6-virtex]$ make zImage CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/linux/compile.h dnsdomainname: Unknown host CC arch/ppc/kernel/t

[git pull] Please pull powerpc.git merge branch

2009-02-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hi Linus ! A few powerpc bits for you for 2.6.29. A few bug and regression fixes (after this pull, it will be regressions only), a couple of board device tree updates and some trivialities such as build breakage with random config options due to missing includes. Among others, this should solve t

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/cell: fix dependency in cpufreq

2009-02-09 Thread Michael Neuling
> > cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by > > cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > > --- > > I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really > > depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI? > > No I d

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Added 36-bit physical device tree for mpc8572ds board

2009-02-09 Thread Kumar Gala
Added a device tree that should be identical to mpc8572ds.dtb except the physical addresses for all IO are above the 4G boundary. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_36b.dts | 787 +++ 1 files changed, 787 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) crea

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fixed PCI IO region sizes in mpc8572ds*.dts

2009-02-09 Thread Kumar Gala
The PCI IO region sizes where incorrectly set to 1M instead of 64k. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts| 10 +- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_camp_core0.dts |8 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts |4 ++-- 3 files

Please pull from 'merge' branch (updated)(for 2.6.29)

2009-02-09 Thread Kumar Gala
Please pull from 'merge' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git merge to receive the following updates: arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts | 11 --- arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/mpc8313_rdb_defconfig |2 +- arch/powerpc/mm/fsl_boo

[PATCH] powerpc/fsl-booke: Fix mapping functions to use phys_addr_t

2009-02-09 Thread Kumar Gala
Fixed v_mapped_by_tlbcam() and p_mapped_by_tlbcam() to use phys_addr_t instead of unsigned long. In 36-bit physical mode we really need these functions to deal with phys_addr_t when trying to match a physical address or when returning one. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/mm/fsl_booke

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/cell: fix dependency in cpufreq

2009-02-09 Thread Michael Neuling
> > > cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by > > > cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > > > --- > > > I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really > > > depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PM

[PATCH] Only disable/enable LSI interrupts in EEH

2009-02-09 Thread Mike Mason
The EEH code disables and enables interrupts during the device recovery process. This is unnecessary for MSI and MSI-X interrupts because they are effectively disabled by the DMA Stopped state when an EEH error occurs. The current code is also incorrect for MSI-X interrupts. It doesn't take i

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/cell: fix dependency in cpufreq

2009-02-09 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 11:46 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by > cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > --- > I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ reall

[PATCH] powerpc/cell: fix dependency in cpufreq

2009-02-09 Thread Michael Neuling
cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling --- I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI? arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Kconfig |

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/cell: add missing #include for oprofile

2009-02-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 09 February 2009, Michael Neuling wrote: > arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_profiler.c is missing a asm/time.h > include which is required for ppc_proc_freq. This can cause compile > failures for some config combinations. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann _

Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC

2009-02-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > Paul, > > > > I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting > > up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate > > the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but t

Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac: new ppc4xx driver module

2009-02-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:01:19 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:49:47AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > >On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:40:41 -0800 > >Grant Erickson wrote: > > > >> On 1/30/09 2:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:54:42 -0700 dougthomp...@xmission.co

Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac: new ppc4xx driver module

2009-02-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:49:47AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:40:41 -0800 >Grant Erickson wrote: > >> On 1/30/09 2:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:54:42 -0700 dougthomp...@xmission.com wrote: >> >> From: Grant Erickson >> > >> > Perhaps a powerpc

Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC

2009-02-09 Thread Geoff Levand
Steven Rostedt wrote: > I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting > up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate > the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but the bottom half was > a signed extended short, and it should have been an addition. > The

Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC

2009-02-09 Thread Remis Lima Baima
I have just tried the patch here and everything worked great! Very well done. On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> >> Paul, >> >> I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting >> up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple mat

Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/83xx: Fix TSEC0 workability on MPC8313E-RDB boards

2009-02-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 9, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Li Yang wrote: It's a complex case for RDB boards. The revision A and revision B boards DO always connect TSEC0 to Vitesse switch. While the latest revision C board has one setting to connect TSEC0 to a Marvell PHY and MDIO bus. In BSP we have several DTS's for e

Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC

2009-02-09 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > > > Paul, > > > > > > I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting > > > up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate > > > the o

Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC

2009-02-09 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > Paul, > > > > I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting > > up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate > > the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but the bottom

Re: Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)

2009-02-09 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2009, Paul Collins wrote: > > Paul Collins writes: > > > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > > > >> On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Paul Collins wrote: > > >>> Got a couple of these on a PowerBook running 2.6.29-rc2 either dur

Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC

2009-02-09 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Paul, > > I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting > up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate > the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but the bottom half was > a signed extended short, and it should have been

[PATCH] Defconfig for mpc5200 updates.

2009-02-09 Thread Grzegorz Bernacki
Add support for: - LXT phy - AT24 eeprom - RTC (DS1337) - MTD partitioning based on OF description Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki --- arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_defconfig | 72 1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc