On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 11:46 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by > cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org> > --- > I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really > depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI?
No I don't think it is. Look at platforms/cell/cbe_cpufreq.h, the intention seems to be that if PMI isn't built in then that variable is hardcoded to 0 and we never use the pmi routines. cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
